Indirect
Restorations ("laboratory made restorations")
Indirect dental restorations are custom made fillings placed into teeth by
your dentist. Indirect restorations are made according to the doctor's
prescription by a dental laboratory technician working in a dental
laboratory.
Fine quality dental laboratory technicians are specially
trained professional craftsmen who devote their careers to making all sorts of
indirect dental restorations (inlays, onlays, crowns, bridgework, partial
dentures, and complete dentures) according to the doctor's detailed
prescription. The best dental laboratory technicians are skilled artisans
who contribute a talent for sculpture in miniature, an artist's eye for color, a
knowledge of jaw mechanics and proper bite, and an advanced knowledge of dental
materials to patient care. Dental laboratory technicians are an important
part of the team of dental office professionals who work together to bring
patients the benefits of modern dentistry. Our office only works with the
finest dental laboratory technicians to enhance the beauty and durability of our
indirect restorations.
Dental laboratory technicians work with high precision models
of both the treated and untreated tooth or teeth. The models are
made from incredibly accurate impressions taken in the mouth by the doctor and
dental assistant. Indirect dental restorations generally require two separate
treatment appointments to complete.
During the first appointment the following steps are completed:
| Numbing the area of treatment, so care will be pain free. |
|
Removing decayed or weakened hard tooth structure (enamel and dentin)
and preparation of the cavity. |
|
Special impressions which make precise duplication of the shape of the
treated tooth and cavity. This duplication process allows a dental
technician to make the indirect restoration (according to the doctor's
prescription) in the dental laboratory. |
|
placement of a temporary restoration. |
At the second appointment the following steps are completed:
| numbing the area of treatment, so care will be pain free. |
|
removal of the temporary restoration. |
|
placement of the final restoration. |
Selecting the appropriate
direct restoration to meet the needs of the patient and the individual tooth
depends on a large variety of factors. Each material has different
physical properties, and different advantages and disadvantages as a result.
The
weight of scientific evidence is that all of these materials are
safe and effective for their intended use when properly placed in the
appropriate clinical situation.
Dental
Insurance may provide coverage for the least expensive material than can be
used, whether or not it is the best material recommended by the dentist after
discussing this with the patient. Patients, in consultation with their
dentist, should be free to choose the most appropriate among them for their
particular needs, and individual desires.
Crowns
("caps") and Fixed Partial Dentures ("bridgework") are
restorations that are placed over one or more teeth after they are suitably
reshaped. Crowns and Fixed Bridgework may be made out of the same
materials that are used for indirect fillings.
The following chart illustrates
some common considerations your dentist takes into account when determining
which material is best for a particular tooth needing an indirect restoration.
The list is by no means complete.
FACTORS
|
COMPOSITES
(Indirect) |
ALL-PORCELAIN
(ceramic)
|
PORCELAIN
Fused to
METAL
|
GOLD
ALLOYS
(high noble)
|
BASE
METAL ALLOYS
(non-noble)
|
General
Description |
A
mixture of tiny glass filler particles and acrylic resin that forms a solid
tooth-colored restoration. Laboratory processing increases
strength compared to direct composites cured in the mouth. |
Porcelain,
ceramic or glass-like fillings and crowns. |
Porcelain
is fused to an underlying metal structure to provide strength to a
filling, crown or bridge. |
Alloy
of gold, copper and other metals resulting in a strong, effective
filling, crown or bridge. |
Alloys
of non-noble metals with silver appearance resulting in high strength
crowns and bridges. |
Principal
Uses |
Esthetic
dental fillings and veneers |
Esthetic
and Strong dental fillings, inlays,
onlays, crowns & veneers. |
Inlays,
onlays, crowns
and fixed bridges |
Inlays,
onlays, crowns & fixed bridges. |
Crowns,
fixed bridges & partial dentures. |
Leakage
and Recurrent Decay |
Leakage
low when properly bonded to underlying tooth; recurrent decay depends
on maintenance of the tooth-material bond. |
Leakage
very low if properly bonded to underlying tooth structure. Recurrent decay depends
on maintenance of the tooth-material bond. |
The
commonly used methods used for placement provide a good seal against
leakage. The incidence of
recurrent decay is similar to other restorative procedures. |
Durability |
Fair
to Good
in small-to-moderate size restorations, if not subject to biting forces. |
Excellent
durability, very strong yet
able to withstand biting forces well. |
Very
strong and durable. |
Very
strong and durable, but lower quality alloys may have poor corrosion resistance. |
Dentist's
Cavity
Preparation Considerations |
Strength
depends on adequate composite resin thickness, requires moderate tooth
reduction during preparation (1 to 2 mm). |
Strength depends on adequate porcelain thickness, requires more tooth reduction during preparation.
Usually more conservative than a crown & may eliminate need to
crown a tooth. |
Including
both porcelain and metal creates a stronger restoration than porcelain
alone; more tooth reduction is required (1.5 to 2 mm). |
The
relative high strength of metals in thin sections requires the least
amount of healthy tooth structure removal. |
Clinical
Considerations |
These
are multiple step procedures requiring highly accurate clinical and
laboratory processing. Some restorations require at least two visits,
others require multiple appointments. |
Resistance
to Wear |
Moderately
resistant, but less so than silver amalgam alloy. |
Highly
resistant to wear. Inferior grades of porcelain can rapidly wear opposing teeth
in some situations. |
Highly
resistant to wear, but porcelain can rapidly wear opposing teeth in
some situations |
Resistant
to wear and gentle to opposing teeth. |
Resistant
to wear and gentle to opposing teeth. |
Resistance
to Fracture |
Moderate
resistance to fracture in high-load restorations, some what better
than direct composite restorations. |
Excellent
strength if properly bonded to underlying tooth structure. Fracture is
uncommon. |
Excellent
resistance to fracture. |
Highly
resistant to fracture. |
Biocompatibility |
Reasonably
well tolerated. Material may release estrogen-like chemicals, but
clinical significance is unknown. |
Very
well
tolerated. |
Very
well
tolerated if high quality noble metal used. Low quality base metals
may can cause allergic reactions. |
Very
well tolerated. |
Well
tolerated, but some patients may show allergenic sensitivity to base
metals. |
Post-Placement
Sensitivity |
Sensitivity, if present, is usually not material specific.
|
Occurrence
of sensitivity highly dependent on ability to adequately bond the
restoration to the underlying tooth. |
Sensitivity
is rare when proper placement of quality materials is done. |
Low
thermal conductivity reduces the likelihood of discomfort from hot and
cold. |
High
thermal conductivity may result in early post-placement discomfort
from hot and cold. |
Esthetics |
Mimics
natural tooth color and translucency, but can be subject to staining
and discoloration over time. |
Excellent
esthetics, color
and translucency which can very closely match natural tooth appearance. |
Excellent
Esthetics, color & translucency. Porcelain
can very closely match natural tooth appearance, but metal may diminish
translucency if placement not well done. |
Metal
colors do not mimic natural tooth coloration or translucency. |
Relative
Cost to Patient |
Moderate;
actual cost of fillings depends on size and technique. Generally
requires at least two office visits and laboratory services. |
Higher;
requires at least two office visits and laboratory services. |
Higher;
requires at least two office visits and laboratory services. |
Higher;
requires at least two office visits and laboratory services. |
Average
Number of Visits To Complete |
Two
or more visits for indirect inlays, onlays, veneers and crowns. |
Minimum
of two; matching esthetics of teeth may require more visits. |
Minimum
of two; matching esthetics of teeth
may require more visits. |
Minimum
of two |
Comparison
of Restorative Dental Materials Reference List
1. US
Public Health Service. "Dental Amalgam: A Scientific Review and Recommended
Public Health Service Strategy for Research, Education and Regulation."
January 1993 (Section on Dental Materials for Restoring Posterior Teeth.)
2.
US Public Health Service. "Dental Amalgam: A Scientific Review and
Recommended Public Health Service Strategy for Research, Education and
Regulation." January 1993 (Table 2: Selected Characteristics of Posterior
Restorative Materials.)
3.
American Dental Association, Council on Dental Materials, Instruments and
Equipment. "Choosing Intracoronal Restorative Materials." JADA 1994;
125:102-3.
4.
American Dental Association, Council on Scientific Affairs; Council on Dental
Benefit Programs. "Statement on Posterior Resin-Based Composites."
JADA 1998; 129:1627-8.
5.
Douglass CW. "Future Needs for Dental Restorative Materials." Adv Dent
Res 1992; 6:4-6.
6.
Reich E. "Risks and Benefits of Direct Restorative Materials as
Alternatives to Amalgam." Dental Amalgam and Alternative Direct Restorative
Materials, Oral Health, Division of Noncommunicable Diseases, World Health
Organization, Geneva 1997; 1-15.
7.
American Dental Association, Division of Communications. "Answers to Your
Questions About Silver Fillings." 2000.
8. American
Dental Association, Division of Communications. "Dental Materials."
1993.
9.
US Public Health Service, "Update Statement by the U.S. Public Health
Service on the Safety of Dental Amalgam." Annex A and Appendix B, 1995
& 2001.
10.
Burgess JO, Norling BK, Rawls HR, Ong JL. "Directly Placed Esthetic
Restorative Materials - The Continuum." Compendium 1996; 17:731-748.
11.
US Food and Drug Administration, "Consumer Update: Dental Amalgams February
2002." http://www.fda.gov./cdrh/consumer/amalgams.html, February 8, 2002.
12. Mackert,
J.R., Berglund, A. "Mercury Exposure from Dental Amalgam Fillings: Absorbed
Dose and the Potential for Adverse Health Effects." Ctir Rev Oral Biol Med
1997; 8:410-436.
13.
Smith, C.T., Gold as a Historic Standard and its Role for the Future, Operative
Dentistry 2001;Suppliment 6:105-110.
14.
Peutzfeldt, A., Indirect Resin and Ceramic Systems, Operative Dentistry
2001:Suppliment 6:153-176.
NOTE:
The information in this chart is provided to help dentists discuss the
attributes of commonly used dental restorative materials with their patients.
The chart is a simple overview of the subject based on the current dental
literature. It
is not intended to be comprehensive.
The attributes of a particular restorative material will vary from case
to case depending on a number of factors. Chart
above modified from a chart published by the American Dental Association, 2002.